ActiveMSers Forums  

Go Back   ActiveMSers Forums > ActiveMSers.org Forums > Gear

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-05-2019, 12:49 PM
ActiveMSers's Avatar
ActiveMSers ActiveMSers is online now
Dave @ ActiveMSers
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 3,834
Default Accessible exercise equipment and MSers: Aerobic demands and preferences

Accessible exercise equipment and individuals with multiple sclerosis: Aerobic demands and preferences

Authors: Snyder, Kaitlyn J.a; b | Patsakos, Elenia; b | White, Johna; b | Ditor, David S.a; b; *

Affiliations: [a] Department of Kinesiology, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada | [b] Brock-Niagara Centre for Health and Well-being, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada

Abstract:

BACKGROUND:Although exercise training has benefits for individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS), research regarding the type of exercise equipment that requires the greatest aerobic demand, and consumer-based preferences, is lacking.

OBJECTIVE:To determine the aerobic demands of various pieces of accessible exercise equipment and consumer-based preferences on several domains.

METHODS:Ten individuals with moderate-severity MS had their VO2 measured during 10 minutes of moderate-intensity arm ergometry (AE), body-weight support treadmill training (BWSTT), recumbent arm-leg exercise (NuStep), FES-arm exercise (RT300), FES-leg exercise (RT300) and FES arm-leg exercise (RT200). VO2peak test was also measured on the NuStep and the RT200. Equipment preferences were determined by questionnaire after moderate exercise sessions. RESULTS:AE required a lower VO2 compared to the NuStep (p = 0.02), and FES-arm exercise required a lower VO2 compared to the NuStep (p = 0.01) and FES arm-leg exercise (p = 0.04). There was no difference in VO2peak when using the NuStep or FES arm-leg exercise. AE was perceived as safer than BWSTT, but otherwise there were no preferences for any equipment.
CONCLUSIONS:For individuals with moderate-severity MS, arm-only exercise requires less aerobic demands than combined arm-leg exercise at a moderate intensity. Perceived risks may be greater when exercise requires a transfer, upright positioning, or assistance.

Keywords: Exercise equipment, aerobic demand, consumer-based preferences, multiple sclerosis

DOI: 10.3233/NRE-192861

Journal: NeuroRehabilitation, vol. Pre-press, no. Pre-press, pp. 1-9, 2019

Published: 28 November 2019
__________________
Dave Bexfield
ActiveMSers
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ActiveMSers