ActiveMSers Forums  

Go Back   ActiveMSers Forums > ActiveMSers.org Forums > Dave's SCT Journey

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-12-2017, 11:36 AM
ActiveMSers's Avatar
ActiveMSers ActiveMSers is offline
Dave @ ActiveMSers
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 3,400
Default AHSCT in Advanced Treatment Refractory MS, a Phase II Trial

Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (AHSCT) in Advanced, Treatment Refractory Multiple Sclerosis (MS) a Phase II Clinical Trial

Jennifer Massey, John Moore, Ian Sutton, Chun Kei Kris Ma, Sam Milliken and David Ma

Blood 2017 130:4553;
ArticleInfo & Metricse-Letters

Abstract

Aim: Ablation of auto-reactive immune cells followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) has been explored for the previous two decades. Morbidity and mortality rates originally limited referral for AHSCT in auto-immune disease but a reduction in treatment toxicity has facilitated increased clinical trials in the field. Here we present the outcomes of patients withadvanced, treatment refractory MS undergoing AHSCT in a Phase II study at our institute. We evaluate the safety and efficacy of AHSCT with intermediate-intensity immunosuppression in patients with highly aggressive MS.

Methods: A single-centre, phase II clinical trial of AHSCT for patients with active relapsing remitting (RRMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS) commenced at St Vincent's Hospital in December 2010. Patients eligible for AHSCT had an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of 2.0-7, had failed two prior disease-modifying therapies and displayed evidence of ongoing disease activity manifesting as clinical relapses and/or new MRI lesions in the year prior to AHSCT. CD34+ mobilisation with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF was performed, followed by conditioning with a BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) + ATG (antithymocyte globulin) chemotherapeutic regimen. Patients underwent clinical assessment and peripheral blood collection for tissue banking at 3, 6, 12 months and yearly to 5 years. Gadolinium enhanced MRI was performed at 6, 12 months and yearly to 5 years. The primary outcomes were event-free survival and overall survival. Event free survival (EFS) was defined as no clinical or radiological relapses and no evidence of disability progression (by EDSS). Polychromic multi-parameter flow cytometry was performed for evaluation of post-transplant immune reconstitution.

Results: Forty patients (26 with RRMS and 14 with SPMS) completed AHSCT, with a median follow-up of 24 months (range 3 to 63 months). Median EDSS prior to AHSCT was 6, with 17/40 having an EDSS >6, indicating a significant burden of neurologic disability. Patients were heavily pre-treated with immunosuppressive drugs (DMTs). Fifty-six percent of patients failed >4 disease modifying therapies prior to AHSCT with 2/3 having failed high efficacy treatment with Natalizumab (alpha-4 integrin inhibitor).

Progression-free survival, clinical relapse-free survival (RFS), and MRI activity-free survival for the cohort were 80%, 90% and 95% respectively. Event free survival in the RRMS cohort was 90%. Sustained improvement in neurologic function by EDSS was seen in 15/40 (37.5%) of patients; 11 (42.3%) RRMS patients and 4 (28.6%) SPMS patients. MS quality of life score (MSQOL) - physical improved by 14.4 points (p=0.004) and MSQOL - mental improved by 10.3 points (p=0.08). Treatment related mortality was 0%. Adverse effects due to AHSCT were consistent with expected toxicities. One patient required admission to the intensive care unit in the post-transplant period due to serum sickness. There were no significant late neurologic adverse effects noted and no recorded cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy noted.

Conclusion: The relapse-free survival (RFS) in our treatment refractory MS cohort undergoing AHSCT is significantly higher compared to RFS rates in MS patients treated with high-efficacy immunosuppressive therapies. Patients undergoing AHSCT at our institution had comparable rates of EFS to other recent prospective, single centre trials of AHSCT in spite of having higher baseline EDSS, greater evidence of pre-AHSCT disease activity, more heavily pre-treated (Burt et al. 2015, Atkins et al 2016) and use of a less aggressive conditioning regimen (Atkins et al. 2016). In summary, results of this phase II study suggest that AHSCT is effective in inducing sustained remission in the majority of aggressive RRMS and SPMS patients who failed multiple DMTs.
__________________
Dave Bexfield
ActiveMSers
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ActiveMSers