ActiveMSers Forums  

Go Back   ActiveMSers Forums > ActiveMSers.org Forums > MS Fitness

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-05-2019, 06:17 PM
ActiveMSers's Avatar
ActiveMSers ActiveMSers is online now
Dave @ ActiveMSers
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 3,717
Default Resistance training in MS appears to be neuroprotective, but why asks researchers

Plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and sphingosine-1-phosphat (S1P) are NOT the main mediators of neuroprotection induced by resistance training in persons with multiple sclerosis - a randomized controlled trial

MLK Jørgensen, T. Kjølhede, et al
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2019.03.029

Highlights
•Long-term resistance training does not alter acute or chronic BDNF (or S1P) levels in pwMS

•Long-term resistance training improves neuromuscular activity and muscle strength in pwMS

•BDNF (or S1P) are NOT a main mediator of neuroprotection induced by resistance training in pwMS

•Large variability are generally observed in circulating BDNF levels

Abstract

Resistance training (RT) has been shown to elicit neuroprotective effects in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and Sphingosine-1-phosphat (S1P) have been put forward as potent mediators of the neuroprotective effects induced by RT. However, while increases have been shown in acute and chronic circulating BDNF levels in pwMS following aerobic exercise alone or in combination with other exercise regimes, no studies have examined this in response to RT.

As a novel ‘proof-of-concept’ approach, we therefore examined the effects of 24 weeks of RT on acute and chronic circulating BDNF and S1P levels in the same pwMS whom our group had previously observed RT-induced neuroprotective effects in (i.e. increased cortical thickness and preservation of whole brain volume).

A total of n=30 relapsing-remitting pwMS were randomized into a training group (TG: 24 weeks of progressive high intensity resistance training, 2 sessions per week; n=16, age 44[40:51] years, EDSS score 3.0[2.0:3.5] (median[IQR]) or a control group (CG: 24 weeks of habitual lifestyle; n=14, age 45[37:47] years, EDSS score 3.0[2.5:3.5]). Plasma levels of BDNF and S1P were assessed by ELISA kits before and after the 24-week intervention period.

No within- or between group changes were observed in acute or chronic circulating levels of BDNF. A substantial proportion of the participants had S1P levels below the detection limit, yet no within- or between changes were observed in chronic S1P plasma levels in the remaining samples.

Thus, the present findings do not support that circulating plasma BDNF or S1P levels are the main mediators of the neuroprotective effects previously reported in the same group of pwMS.
__________________
Dave Bexfield
ActiveMSers
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ActiveMSers