ActiveMSers Forums  

Go Back   ActiveMSers Forums > ActiveMSers.org Forums > General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-01-2018, 01:25 PM
ActiveMSers's Avatar
ActiveMSers ActiveMSers is online now
Dave @ ActiveMSers
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 3,415
Default STUDY: Early versus later treatment start in multiple sclerosis

For you fence-sitters out there. -D

----------------------

Eur J Neurol. 2018 May 30. doi: 10.1111/ene.13692. [Epub ahead of print]

Early versus later treatment start in multiple sclerosis a register based cohort study.

Chalmer T1,2, Baggesen LM3, Nørgaard M3, Koch-Henriksen N2,3, Magyari M1,2, Sorensen PS1,2; Danish Multiple Sclerosis Group.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:
To assess long-term treatment effectiveness of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) initiated in early disease course versus later treatment start.

METHODS:
We included all Danish multiple sclerosis (MS) patients treated with DMT through two nationwide population-based MS registries. Patients were categorized as early treated if treatment started within two years after the first MS symptom (n=2,316) and later treated patients if treatment started between two and eight years after clinical onset (n=1,479). We compared time from treatment start to progression to Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 6 and mortality between cohorts as hazard ratio (HR) using a Cox proportional hazards model with adjustment for stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights. Several sensitivity analyses were conducted.

RESULTS:
Median follow-up time of 3,795 patients was 7.0 years (range 0.6-19.5) for the EDSS 6 outcome, and 10.4 years (range 1.2-20.1) for the mortality outcome. Patients with later treatment start showed 42% increased hazard rate of reaching EDSS 6 compared with the early treated patients (HR 1.42; 95% CI 1.18-1.70; p<0.001). When stratified by sex the increased hazard among later treated women persisted (HR 1.53; 95% CI 1.22-1.93; p<0.001), while the HR was lower in men (1.25; 95% CI 0.93-1.69; p=0.15). Mortality was 38% increased in later starters (HR 1.38; 95% CI 0.96-1.99; p=0.08).

CONCLUSION:
Patients who started treatment with DMT later had shorter time to reaching EDSS 6 compared with patients who started early, and the delay showed a tendency to shorten time to death. Our results support the use of early treatment.

__________________
Dave Bexfield
ActiveMSers
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-05-2018, 08:23 PM
GoatHerder GoatHerder is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 75
Default Graphic Cracked Me Up

...that said, I started DMT 1 week after diagnosis, and while I ended up in a chair only 2 years after; I've been stable for 16 years since!

I'm on Avonex, once a week IM injection and have been since 2002 (much to the dismay of my insurance company!) I credit the Avonex and some daily physical therapy for my disease stability. Lots of prayer helps too!
__________________
Retired engineer, now hobby farmer with goats, chickens, an old dog,and a lazy barn cat!
Watch my goats at GoatsLive.com
Active in amateur radio
Linux geek, blogging at lnxgoat.com
M.S. since 2000
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ActiveMSers