Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

STUDY: 2-Year Follow-Up Results Of The HALT MS Clinical Trial

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • STUDY: 2-Year Follow-Up Results Of The HALT MS Clinical Trial

    An update of my clinical trial was released Saturday, June 1, 2013. Potent results so far; I'm fortunate to have been a part of it. - Dave

    Richard A Nash, MD , Colorado Blood Cancer Institute at PSL, Denver, CO
    George J Hutton, MD , Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
    Michael K Racke, MD , The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
    Uday Popat, MD , MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
    Steven M Devine, MD , The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
    George E Georges, MD , Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
    Linda M Griffith, MD PhD , National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
    Paolo A Muraro, MD , Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
    Harry Openshaw, MD , City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
    Peter Sayre, MD , Immune Tolerance Network, San Francisco, CA
    Olaf Stuve, MD , University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX
    Douglas L Arnold, MD , Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, and NeuroRx Research, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada
    Meagan Spychala, DrPH , Rho Federal Systems Division, Inc, Chapel Hill, NC
    Noha Lim, PhD , Immune Tolerance Network, Boston, MA
    Sachin Malhotra, PhD , Immune Tolerance Network, Boston, MA
    Deborah Phippard, PhD , Immune Tolerance Network, San Francisco, CA
    Annette Wundes, MD , University of Washington, Seattle, WA
    George H Kraft, MD , University of Washington, Seattle, WA
    James D Bowen, MD , Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA


    Background:
    Patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) do not achieve a sustained remission after disease-modifying therapy.

    Objectives: A phase II clinical trial of high-dose immunochemotherapy (HDIT; BEAM/antithymocyte globulin) and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was conducted in patients with highly active RRMS who had failed conventional therapy to assess if sustained remission could be induced.

    Methods: Eligibility required an EDSS of 3.0 to 5.5 and >2 relapses on treatment in previous 18 months. Treatment-failure was defined as a composite endpoint of 1) mortality 2) relapse 3) new MRI lesions or 4) disability increase >0.5 EDSS points. Adverse events (AE) were recorded according to NCI-CTCAE v3.0.

    Results: 25 patients at a median age of 38(27-53) years were mobilized with G-CSF only; prednisone was given at the same time to prevent MS flares. The autograft was CD34-selected. One patient withdrew after mobilization secondary to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia/pulmonary embolus. 24 patients had HDIT/HCT according to protocol. Median follow-up was 131 (52, 282) weeks. After initially stabilizing, one patient died from progressive loss of neurological function at 32 months. In the 1st year after HDIT, there were 42 grade 3 and 6 grade 4 non-hematopoietic AE. Grade 4 AE included: one suicide attempt (with 3 grade 4 AE); hyperuricemia; hypokalemia; and elevated ALT. In the 2nd year, there were 13 grade 3 and 1 grade 4 non-hematopoietic AE. The 1-year and 2-year probabilities of event-free survival (i.e. without treatment-failure) were 95.8% (90% CI: 80.2%-99.2%) and 82.8% (90% CI: 65.0%-92.0%), respectively. Progression-free and relapse-free survival at 1 year were 100% (90% CI: 100%-100%) and 95.8% (90% CI: 80.2%-99.2%) and at 2 years were 91.7% (90% CI: 75.7%-97.3%) and 91.7% (90% CI: 75.7%-97.3%), respectively. The probability of freedom from disease activity detected by brain MRI was 95.8% (90% CI: 80.2%-99.2%) at both year 1 and 2. In comparison, a randomized clinical trial of placebo vs natalizumab (Havrdova E et al, Lancet Neurology, 2009) showed that 7% and 37% of RRMS patients were free of disease activity at 2 years, respectively.

    T2 lesion volume was significantly reduced by 6 months and was sustained at 2 years. T1 lesion volume was minimally increased at 1 year. There was a significant loss of brain volume at 6 months but stabilized thereafter.

    By flow cytometry, memory CD4 and CD8 T cells (CD45RO+) were not completely eliminated from the blood after in vivo depletion from HDIT. The numbers of CD4 naïve and memory T cells were not recovered at 1 year. CD4 and CD8 recent thymic emigrants (CD45RA+, CD31+) were increased at 1 year compared to the nadir at 1 month but did not completely recover.

    Conclusions: HDIT/HCT for highly active RRMS resulted in profound immunosuppression and induced a high rate of sustained remissions at 2 years. Patients will be followed on study for 5 years.
    Dave Bexfield
    ActiveMSers

  • #2
    An article covering this news...

    Transplant Promising as MS Therapy
    By John Gever, Deputy Managing Editor, MedPage Today
    Published: June 05, 2013

    ORLANDO -- High-dose immunosuppressant therapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) induced durable freedom from relapses and MRI lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis, researchers reported here.

    At evaluations performed 1 and 2 years after the procedure, patients showed no gadolinium-enhancing lesions on MRI scans, and only six of the 24 patients receiving the transplants experienced relapses, reported Richard A. Nash, MD, of Colorado Blood Cancer Institute in Denver, and colleagues.

    In a poster presented at the joint meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers and the Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, the investigators indicated that overall functional ability and quality of life were improved as well with the transplant procedure....

    http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingC...-ACTRIMS/39593
    Dave Bexfield
    ActiveMSers

    Comment


    • #3
      Dave, I noticed that 1 person died from MS related causes in the trial. So this would equate to about a 4% chance of death with this protocol. Did you know this person and were there any unsual circumastances in this persons death? I know a lot of people are looking at myoblative protocal for MS becuase they think it is safe and "more effective" than the non-myeoblative protocol such as what is performed by Dr. Richard Burt, but after looking at this I am not so sure.

      Comment


      • #4
        CV, my trial doctors have told me that the death was not related to the trial (chemo side effects, infection, or otherwise) after their in-depth analysis. It appears to have been the patient's aggressive MS, which the treatment failed to halt in this particular case. Very sad. Even the most powerful treatment available for MS can't stop the most virulent forms of this disease every time.
        Dave Bexfield
        ActiveMSers

        Comment


        • #5
          Perhaps the most eye-opening results from this study so far is the comparison vs Tysabri, the most powerful FDA-approved drug to date: "The probability of freedom from disease activity detected by brain MRI was 95.8% (90% CI: 80.2%-99.2%) at both year 1 and 2. In comparison, a randomized clinical trial of placebo vs natalizumab (Havrdova E et al, Lancet Neurology, 2009) showed that 7% and 37% of RRMS patients were free of disease activity at 2 years, respectively."

          It's still early days and not a direct Tysabri vs HSCT trial (even comparing the two treatments this way is somewhat flawed), but since I know more than a few who are 10+ years out with no progression (from earlier similar studies), this treatment's success portends well.
          Dave Bexfield
          ActiveMSers

          Comment

          Working...
          X