Dietary interventions for multiple sclerosis.
Farinotti M, Vacchi L, Simi S, Di Pietrantonj C, Brait L, Filippini G.
Neuroepidemiology Unit, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta,
via Celoria 11, Milano, Italy, 20133.
BACKGROUND: Clinical and experimental data suggest that certain dietary regimens,
particularly those including polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and vitamins,
might improve outcomes in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Diets and dietary
supplements are much used by people with MS in the belief that they might improve
disease outcomes and overcome the effectiveness limits of conventional
treatments.This is an update of the Cochrane review "Dietary intervention for
multiple sclerosis" (first published on The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 1).
OBJECTIVES: To answer MS patients' questions regarding the efficacy and safety of
dietary regimens for MS. Can changes in dietary habits be an effective
intervention for MS patients? Are the potential side effects of these
interventions known, and have they been measured? Are potential interactions
between dietary interventions and other curative or symptomatic treatments known
and have they been studied?
SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of
the Central Nervous System Group Specialised Register (November 2011), CENTRAL
(The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 4), MEDLINE (PubMed) (1966 to November 2011),
EMBASE (embase.com) (1974 to November 2011) and reference lists of papers found.
SELECTION CRITERIA: All controlled trials (randomised controlled trials (RCTs)
and controlled clinical trials (CCTs)) on a specific dietary intervention, diet
plan or dietary supplementation, except for vitamin D supplementation, compared
to no dietary modification or placebo were eligible.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected articles,
assessed trial quality and extracted data. Data were entered and analysed in
RevMan.Dichotomous data were summarised as relative risks (RR) with 95%
confidence intervals (95% CI) using a random-effects model in the presence of
heterogeneity (I² > 60%). Continuous data were analysed using weighted mean
differences, determined by the difference between the pre- and post-intervention
changes in the treatment and control groups.
MAIN RESULTS: Six RCTs that investigated PUFAs emerged from the search strategy,
accounting for 794 randomised patients.PUFAs did not have a significant effect on
disease progression at 24 months. Omega-6 fatty acids (11 to 23 g/day linoleic
acid) didn't show any benefit in 144 MS patients (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.63).
Linoleic acid (2.9 to 3.4 g/day) had no benefit in 65 chronic progressive MS
patients (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.42). Omega-3 fatty acids had no benefit in
292 relapsing remitting MS patients (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.03, P =
0.08).Slight potential benefits in relapse outcomes were associated with omega-6
fatty acids in some studies, however these findings were limited by the reduced
validity of the endpoints. No judgements about safety or patient-reported
outcomes were possible. In general, trial quality was poor. No studies on vitamin
supplementation and allergen-free diets were analysed as none met the eligibility
criteria, mainly due to lack of clinical outcomes.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: PUFAs seem to have no major effect on the main clinical
outcome in MS (disease progression), but they may tend to reduce the frequency of
relapses over two years. However, the data that are available are insufficient to
assess a real benefit or harm from PUFA supplementation because of their
uncertain quality. Evidence on the possible benefits and risks of vitamin
supplementation and antioxidant supplements in MS is lacking. More research is
required to assess the effectiveness of dietary interventions in MS.
PMID: 23235605 [PubMed - in process]
Farinotti M, Vacchi L, Simi S, Di Pietrantonj C, Brait L, Filippini G.
Neuroepidemiology Unit, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta,
via Celoria 11, Milano, Italy, 20133.
BACKGROUND: Clinical and experimental data suggest that certain dietary regimens,
particularly those including polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and vitamins,
might improve outcomes in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Diets and dietary
supplements are much used by people with MS in the belief that they might improve
disease outcomes and overcome the effectiveness limits of conventional
treatments.This is an update of the Cochrane review "Dietary intervention for
multiple sclerosis" (first published on The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 1).
OBJECTIVES: To answer MS patients' questions regarding the efficacy and safety of
dietary regimens for MS. Can changes in dietary habits be an effective
intervention for MS patients? Are the potential side effects of these
interventions known, and have they been measured? Are potential interactions
between dietary interventions and other curative or symptomatic treatments known
and have they been studied?
SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of
the Central Nervous System Group Specialised Register (November 2011), CENTRAL
(The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 4), MEDLINE (PubMed) (1966 to November 2011),
EMBASE (embase.com) (1974 to November 2011) and reference lists of papers found.
SELECTION CRITERIA: All controlled trials (randomised controlled trials (RCTs)
and controlled clinical trials (CCTs)) on a specific dietary intervention, diet
plan or dietary supplementation, except for vitamin D supplementation, compared
to no dietary modification or placebo were eligible.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected articles,
assessed trial quality and extracted data. Data were entered and analysed in
RevMan.Dichotomous data were summarised as relative risks (RR) with 95%
confidence intervals (95% CI) using a random-effects model in the presence of
heterogeneity (I² > 60%). Continuous data were analysed using weighted mean
differences, determined by the difference between the pre- and post-intervention
changes in the treatment and control groups.
MAIN RESULTS: Six RCTs that investigated PUFAs emerged from the search strategy,
accounting for 794 randomised patients.PUFAs did not have a significant effect on
disease progression at 24 months. Omega-6 fatty acids (11 to 23 g/day linoleic
acid) didn't show any benefit in 144 MS patients (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.63).
Linoleic acid (2.9 to 3.4 g/day) had no benefit in 65 chronic progressive MS
patients (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.42). Omega-3 fatty acids had no benefit in
292 relapsing remitting MS patients (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.03, P =
0.08).Slight potential benefits in relapse outcomes were associated with omega-6
fatty acids in some studies, however these findings were limited by the reduced
validity of the endpoints. No judgements about safety or patient-reported
outcomes were possible. In general, trial quality was poor. No studies on vitamin
supplementation and allergen-free diets were analysed as none met the eligibility
criteria, mainly due to lack of clinical outcomes.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: PUFAs seem to have no major effect on the main clinical
outcome in MS (disease progression), but they may tend to reduce the frequency of
relapses over two years. However, the data that are available are insufficient to
assess a real benefit or harm from PUFA supplementation because of their
uncertain quality. Evidence on the possible benefits and risks of vitamin
supplementation and antioxidant supplements in MS is lacking. More research is
required to assess the effectiveness of dietary interventions in MS.
PMID: 23235605 [PubMed - in process]
Comment