Lancet Neurol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as:
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Jan; 20(1): 38–48.
Published online 2020 Nov 23. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30354-9
Safety and efficacy of amantadine, modafinil, and methylphenidate for fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a randomized, crossover, double-blind trial
Bardia Nourbakhsh, M.D.,1 Nisha Revirajan, M.B.B.S.,2 Bridget Morris, M.S.N.,1 Christian Cordano, M.D.,2 Jennifer Creasman, M.S.P.H,3 Michael Manguinao, B.S.,2 Kristen Krysko, M.D.,2 Alice Rutatangwa, D.O.,2 Caroline Auvray, M.D.,2 Salman Aljarallah, M.B.B.S.,1 Chengshi Jin, Ph.D.,3 Prof Ellen Mowry, M.D.,1,4 Prof Charles McCulloch, Ph.D.,3 and Prof Emmanuelle Waubant, M.D.2
Author information Copyright and License information Disclaimer
The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at Lancet NeurolAssociated Data
Supplementary Materials
Go to:
Abstract
Background
Methylphenidate, modafinil, and amantadine are commonly prescribed medications for alleviating fatigue in multiple sclerosis (MS); however, the evidence supporting their efficacy is sparse and conflicting. Our goal was to compare the efficacy of these three medications against each other and placebo in patients with MS-related fatigue.
Methods
In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-sequence, four-period crossover trial, patients with MS who reported fatigue and had a Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) score of more than 33 were recruited at two academic MS centers in the US. Participants received oral amantadine (up to 100 mg twice daily), modafinil (up to 100 mg twice daily), methylphenidate (up to 10 mg twice daily), or placebo, each given for up to six weeks. All patients were to receive all four study medications, in turn, with two-week washout periods between medications. A biostatistician prepared a concealed allocation schedule, stratified by site, randomly assigning a sequence of medications, in blocks of eight, to a consecutive series of numbers. At the time of enrollment, study pharmacists assigned each participant to the next consecutive number (and hence the sequence of study medications). The statistician and pharmacists had no role in assessing the participants or collecting data, and the participants, caregivers, and assessors were blinded to allocation. The primary outcome measure was the MFIS measured while taking the highest tolerated dose at week five of each medication period, analyzed using a linear mixed-effect regression model. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03185065.
Findings
Between October 4, 2017, and February 27, 2019, 141 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of four medication administration sequences (35 patients to amantadine, placebo, modafinil, methylphenidate sequence; 34 patients to placebo, methylphenidate, amantadine, modafinil sequence; 35 patients to modafinil, amantadine, methylphenidate, placebo sequence; and 37 patients to methylphenidate, modafinil, placebo, amantadine sequence). Data from 136 participants were available for the intent-to-treat analysis of the primary outcome. The estimated mean values of MFIS total scores (95% CI) at baseline and the maximal tolerated dose were as follows: 51.3 (49.0 to 53.6) at baseline, 40.6 (38.2 to 43.1) with placebo, 41.3 (38.8 to 43.7) with amantadine, 39.0 (36.6 to 41.4) with modafinil, and 38.6 (36.2 to 41.0) with methylphenidate (P=0.20 for the overall medication effect in the linear mixed-effect regression model). As compared to placebo [38 patients (31%)], higher proportions of participants reported adverse events while taking amantadine [49 patients (39%)], modafinil [50 patients (40%)], and methylphenidate [51 patients (40%)]. Three serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred during the study (pulmonary embolism and myocarditis while taking amantadine and an MS exacerbation requiring hospitalization while taking modafinil).
Interpretation
Amantadine, modafinil, and methylphenidate were not superior to placebo in improving MS-related fatigue and caused more frequent adverse events. The results of this study do not support an indiscriminate use of amantadine, modafinil, and methylphenidate for the treatment of fatigue in MS.
Published in final edited form as:
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Jan; 20(1): 38–48.
Published online 2020 Nov 23. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30354-9
Safety and efficacy of amantadine, modafinil, and methylphenidate for fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a randomized, crossover, double-blind trial
Bardia Nourbakhsh, M.D.,1 Nisha Revirajan, M.B.B.S.,2 Bridget Morris, M.S.N.,1 Christian Cordano, M.D.,2 Jennifer Creasman, M.S.P.H,3 Michael Manguinao, B.S.,2 Kristen Krysko, M.D.,2 Alice Rutatangwa, D.O.,2 Caroline Auvray, M.D.,2 Salman Aljarallah, M.B.B.S.,1 Chengshi Jin, Ph.D.,3 Prof Ellen Mowry, M.D.,1,4 Prof Charles McCulloch, Ph.D.,3 and Prof Emmanuelle Waubant, M.D.2
Author information Copyright and License information Disclaimer
The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at Lancet NeurolAssociated Data
Supplementary Materials
Go to:
Abstract
Background
Methylphenidate, modafinil, and amantadine are commonly prescribed medications for alleviating fatigue in multiple sclerosis (MS); however, the evidence supporting their efficacy is sparse and conflicting. Our goal was to compare the efficacy of these three medications against each other and placebo in patients with MS-related fatigue.
Methods
In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-sequence, four-period crossover trial, patients with MS who reported fatigue and had a Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) score of more than 33 were recruited at two academic MS centers in the US. Participants received oral amantadine (up to 100 mg twice daily), modafinil (up to 100 mg twice daily), methylphenidate (up to 10 mg twice daily), or placebo, each given for up to six weeks. All patients were to receive all four study medications, in turn, with two-week washout periods between medications. A biostatistician prepared a concealed allocation schedule, stratified by site, randomly assigning a sequence of medications, in blocks of eight, to a consecutive series of numbers. At the time of enrollment, study pharmacists assigned each participant to the next consecutive number (and hence the sequence of study medications). The statistician and pharmacists had no role in assessing the participants or collecting data, and the participants, caregivers, and assessors were blinded to allocation. The primary outcome measure was the MFIS measured while taking the highest tolerated dose at week five of each medication period, analyzed using a linear mixed-effect regression model. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03185065.
Findings
Between October 4, 2017, and February 27, 2019, 141 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of four medication administration sequences (35 patients to amantadine, placebo, modafinil, methylphenidate sequence; 34 patients to placebo, methylphenidate, amantadine, modafinil sequence; 35 patients to modafinil, amantadine, methylphenidate, placebo sequence; and 37 patients to methylphenidate, modafinil, placebo, amantadine sequence). Data from 136 participants were available for the intent-to-treat analysis of the primary outcome. The estimated mean values of MFIS total scores (95% CI) at baseline and the maximal tolerated dose were as follows: 51.3 (49.0 to 53.6) at baseline, 40.6 (38.2 to 43.1) with placebo, 41.3 (38.8 to 43.7) with amantadine, 39.0 (36.6 to 41.4) with modafinil, and 38.6 (36.2 to 41.0) with methylphenidate (P=0.20 for the overall medication effect in the linear mixed-effect regression model). As compared to placebo [38 patients (31%)], higher proportions of participants reported adverse events while taking amantadine [49 patients (39%)], modafinil [50 patients (40%)], and methylphenidate [51 patients (40%)]. Three serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred during the study (pulmonary embolism and myocarditis while taking amantadine and an MS exacerbation requiring hospitalization while taking modafinil).
Interpretation
Amantadine, modafinil, and methylphenidate were not superior to placebo in improving MS-related fatigue and caused more frequent adverse events. The results of this study do not support an indiscriminate use of amantadine, modafinil, and methylphenidate for the treatment of fatigue in MS.
Comment