Researchers dug into what can seriously affect quality of life in MS. Does optimism, positivity, matter? Yup. A lot. -D
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
Available online 1 October 2021, 103293
In Press, Journal Pre-proof
The role of expectations and future-oriented cognitions in quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review
RebeccaMaguire12BethMcKeague1NathalieKóka1LauraCoffey12PhilMaguire3DeirdreDesmond13
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2021.103293
Under a Creative Commons license
open access
Highlights
Abstract
Purpose
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a highly variable condition characterised by uncertainty of disease course which can make formation of expectations about the future difficult. This systematic review aimed to examine associations between expectations, or Future Oriented Cognitions (FOCs), and Quality of Life (QOL) in people with MS (PwMS).
Methods
Following PRISMA guidelines, literature up to October 2019 was searched using Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Quantitative studies that investigated relationships between FOC and QOL in PwMS (assessed using a standardised QOL assessment) were considered for inclusion. After data extraction, results were analysed using narrative synthesis, focusing on the valence of FOCs (positive, negative, unvalenced). Quality appraisal was conducted using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). All stages of the review were patient-led by a person with MS.
Results
A total of 13 studies met the review inclusion criteria, with a combined sample size of 4,179. Of these studies, 11 involved measures of positive FOCs, most commonly self-efficacy, one measured a negative FOC, with one FOC unclassified. Nine studies found significant associations between QOL and self-efficacy. Although other positively valenced constructs were less frequently reported, significant associations with higher QOL were also evidenced.
Conclusions
Identifying ways to foster positive FOCs, particularly self-efficacy, may have beneficial effects on QOL. More research is needed to understand the impacts of negative FOCs on QOL to determine whether these processes could be meaningfully targeted in interventions.
FREE STUDY: https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...11034821005605
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
Available online 1 October 2021, 103293
In Press, Journal Pre-proof
The role of expectations and future-oriented cognitions in quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review
RebeccaMaguire12BethMcKeague1NathalieKóka1LauraCoffey12PhilMaguire3DeirdreDesmond13
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2021.103293
Under a Creative Commons license
open access
Highlights
- MS is an unpredictable disease associated with much uncertainty. The expectations people with MS (PwMS) form about the future may influence their quality of life (QOL)
- Positive thoughts about the future such as self-efficacy expectations appear to be particularly beneficial for the QOL of PwMS
- There is inconclusive evidence regarding the possible impacts of negative expectations (e.g. fears or worries) on QOL in MS.
- Interventions targeted at fostering positive thoughts about future capabilities may be effective in increasing QOL in PwMS.
Abstract
Purpose
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a highly variable condition characterised by uncertainty of disease course which can make formation of expectations about the future difficult. This systematic review aimed to examine associations between expectations, or Future Oriented Cognitions (FOCs), and Quality of Life (QOL) in people with MS (PwMS).
Methods
Following PRISMA guidelines, literature up to October 2019 was searched using Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Quantitative studies that investigated relationships between FOC and QOL in PwMS (assessed using a standardised QOL assessment) were considered for inclusion. After data extraction, results were analysed using narrative synthesis, focusing on the valence of FOCs (positive, negative, unvalenced). Quality appraisal was conducted using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). All stages of the review were patient-led by a person with MS.
Results
A total of 13 studies met the review inclusion criteria, with a combined sample size of 4,179. Of these studies, 11 involved measures of positive FOCs, most commonly self-efficacy, one measured a negative FOC, with one FOC unclassified. Nine studies found significant associations between QOL and self-efficacy. Although other positively valenced constructs were less frequently reported, significant associations with higher QOL were also evidenced.
Conclusions
Identifying ways to foster positive FOCs, particularly self-efficacy, may have beneficial effects on QOL. More research is needed to understand the impacts of negative FOCs on QOL to determine whether these processes could be meaningfully targeted in interventions.
FREE STUDY: https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...11034821005605
Comment