Tweet
Predicting disability progression in multiple sclerosis: Insights from advanced statistical modeling
Fabio Pellegrini, Massimiliano Copetti, Maria Pia Sormani, et al
First Published November 5, 2019
https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458519887343
Abstract
Background:
There is an unmet need for precise methods estimating disease prognosis in multiple sclerosis (MS).
Objective:
Using advanced statistical modeling, we assessed the prognostic value of various clinical measures for disability progression.
Methods:
Advanced models to assess baseline prognostic factors for disability progression over 2 years were applied to a pooled sample of patients from placebo arms in four different phase III clinical trials. least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and ridge regression, elastic nets, support vector machines, and unconditional and conditional random forests were applied to model time to clinical disability progression confirmed at 24 weeks. Sensitivity analyses for different definitions of a combined endpoint were carried out, and bootstrap was used to assess prediction model performance.
Results:
A total of 1582 patients were included, of which 434 (27.4%) had disability progression in a combined endpoint over 2 years. Overall model discrimination performance was relatively poor (all C-indices ⩽ 0.65) across all models and across different definitions of progression.
Conclusion:
Inconsistency of prognostic factor importance ranking confirmed the relatively poor prediction ability of baseline factors in modeling disease progression in MS. Our findings underline the importance to explore alternative predictors as well as alternative definitions of commonly used endpoints.
Fabio Pellegrini, Massimiliano Copetti, Maria Pia Sormani, et al
First Published November 5, 2019
https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458519887343
Abstract
Background:
There is an unmet need for precise methods estimating disease prognosis in multiple sclerosis (MS).
Objective:
Using advanced statistical modeling, we assessed the prognostic value of various clinical measures for disability progression.
Methods:
Advanced models to assess baseline prognostic factors for disability progression over 2 years were applied to a pooled sample of patients from placebo arms in four different phase III clinical trials. least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and ridge regression, elastic nets, support vector machines, and unconditional and conditional random forests were applied to model time to clinical disability progression confirmed at 24 weeks. Sensitivity analyses for different definitions of a combined endpoint were carried out, and bootstrap was used to assess prediction model performance.
Results:
A total of 1582 patients were included, of which 434 (27.4%) had disability progression in a combined endpoint over 2 years. Overall model discrimination performance was relatively poor (all C-indices ⩽ 0.65) across all models and across different definitions of progression.
Conclusion:
Inconsistency of prognostic factor importance ranking confirmed the relatively poor prediction ability of baseline factors in modeling disease progression in MS. Our findings underline the importance to explore alternative predictors as well as alternative definitions of commonly used endpoints.
)
Comment