Tweet
Below is an abstract from a recently released pilot study done to see how exercise affects fatigue and quality of life in us MSers. The exercise group had "significantly greater improvements" across the board. And there were lasting improvements. This is the kind of reinforcement I like to see! How motivating for us to keep active....
Long-term benefits of exercising on quality of life and fatigue in multiple sclerosis patients with mild disability: a pilot study
Ruth McCullagh
Discipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, St James' Site, rmcculla@tcd.ie
Anthony P Fitzgerald
Department of Epidemiology & Public Health and Department of Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, University College Cork
Raymond P Murphy
Department of Neurology, AMNCH, Tallaght, Dublin
Grace Cooke
Mater Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin, Ireland
Objective: To determine if exercise benefits patients with multiple sclerosis.
Design: Randomized controlled trial.
Settings: Participants exercised at home and also attended exercise classes held in a hospital physiotherapy gym.
Subjects: Thirty patients, diagnosed and independently mobile, were recruited in the Dublin area.
Intervention: For three months, classes were held twice-weekly and participants exercised independently once-weekly. The control group was monitored monthly and management remained unchanged.
Measurements: Measurements were taken at baseline, three and six months. The Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) and Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS) were used to measure fatigue and quality of life (QOL). Heart rate (HR) and the Borg's Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) were recorded during an incremental exercise test. The change from baseline scores between groups was compared using the Mann—Whitney U-test.
Results: Twenty-four participants completed the programme (n = 12 in each group). Based on the change in scores at three months, the exercise group had significantly greater improvements in exercise capacity (HR: —14 [-18.5, -2.5] versus 0.5 [-4, 5.5], P= 0.009), QOL (FAMS: 23 [9.5, 42.5] versus -3.5 [-16, 5], P=0.006) and fatigue (MFIS: -13 [-20, -3] versus 1 [-4, 4.5], P=0.02). At six months, the difference in change scores remained significant for FAMS (19 [14, 31] versus -4.5 [-25, 8], P=0.002) and MFIS (-8.5 [-19.5, -1] versus 0.5 [-2.5, 6.5], P=0.02) only.
Conclusions: A three-month exercise programme improved participants' exercise capacity, QOL and fatigue, with the improvements in QOL and fatigue lasting beyond the programme.
Long-term benefits of exercising on quality of life and fatigue in multiple sclerosis patients with mild disability: a pilot study
Ruth McCullagh
Discipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, St James' Site, rmcculla@tcd.ie
Anthony P Fitzgerald
Department of Epidemiology & Public Health and Department of Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, University College Cork
Raymond P Murphy
Department of Neurology, AMNCH, Tallaght, Dublin
Grace Cooke
Mater Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin, Ireland
Objective: To determine if exercise benefits patients with multiple sclerosis.
Design: Randomized controlled trial.
Settings: Participants exercised at home and also attended exercise classes held in a hospital physiotherapy gym.
Subjects: Thirty patients, diagnosed and independently mobile, were recruited in the Dublin area.
Intervention: For three months, classes were held twice-weekly and participants exercised independently once-weekly. The control group was monitored monthly and management remained unchanged.
Measurements: Measurements were taken at baseline, three and six months. The Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) and Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS) were used to measure fatigue and quality of life (QOL). Heart rate (HR) and the Borg's Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) were recorded during an incremental exercise test. The change from baseline scores between groups was compared using the Mann—Whitney U-test.
Results: Twenty-four participants completed the programme (n = 12 in each group). Based on the change in scores at three months, the exercise group had significantly greater improvements in exercise capacity (HR: —14 [-18.5, -2.5] versus 0.5 [-4, 5.5], P= 0.009), QOL (FAMS: 23 [9.5, 42.5] versus -3.5 [-16, 5], P=0.006) and fatigue (MFIS: -13 [-20, -3] versus 1 [-4, 4.5], P=0.02). At six months, the difference in change scores remained significant for FAMS (19 [14, 31] versus -4.5 [-25, 8], P=0.002) and MFIS (-8.5 [-19.5, -1] versus 0.5 [-2.5, 6.5], P=0.02) only.
Conclusions: A three-month exercise programme improved participants' exercise capacity, QOL and fatigue, with the improvements in QOL and fatigue lasting beyond the programme.
LOL!
Comment